Recently the US Congress decided to call for two hearings in quick succession (happens if you are the beacon of democracy in the world that decides to discuss Kashmir and not the Kurds). The hearings were meant to raise the issue around the downgrading of Kashmir to a Union Territory within the sovereign territory of India as well as highlight the plight of Kashmiris in the context of an information lockdown.
As an Indian, who still believes in her country’s diversity and the strong democratic foundation laid by the Constitution, I find everything about Kashmir wrong and oxymoronic. Much as we might want to think of it as heaven, for anyone who has read its history will know that it was anything but that. Its history is replete with one religion, race, ethnicity replacing the other. The Nagas, Buddhists, Brahmins, Muslims, British…all superseded the other to gain rights over the land. The worshippers of Nagas, Shiva, Buddha and Mohammed all tried to gain supremacy of their own faith and beliefs over the other. So, who are its true inheritors? Whose religion should be the one faith there? Much as I would have loved to get the Supreme Court of the country involved, post its recent history I am not so sure about it…
So, coming back to the US Congressional hearings, they managed to create more steam despite being 12,000 kms afar than our own “independent” media. And if we thought that we were running away from the dogfight of the two political parties in India, Kashmiris decided to get involved in a similar fight of the two rival parties in the US. The first hearing held in October 2019 was a case study to any student of a marketing/PR/ advocacy campaign. It involved a good mix of human right activists (who have been nurtured over the years to align to your interests), academicians with a sprinkling of a representative from the minority community and a very good background pre-House briefing to the Congress representatives chairing the session. With such a good prep as many from a marketing or PR background will tell you there is no chance of anything going wrong.
However, the problem with such campaigns today is that technology and social media does not allow the nuances of it to die down so easily, especially if those whom you had relegated to the sidelines (aka the micro minority of Kashmiri Pandits) decide to get their mojo back. As the Turks decided to continue their hammering of the Kurds and as ISIS again starts to make a comeback and the same old Israel-Palestine conflict decides to start again, the US Congress in need for some new flavor in their work decide to hold another hearing on Kashmir (in less than a month). This time a lady whose family had fled the Valley more than 2 decades back, decides to dig in the memories and the facts of 1990s. Of course, she doesn’t do it quietly. For those Kashmiris who have daughters in their families or are married to one will tell you their women are anything but docile. Rub them the wrong way or do anything unfair, you wouldn’t be able to make a difference between a bull or a KP woman. So Sunanda Vashisht based in the US decided to attend the hearing and reveal what happened in Kashmir of 1990s – ISIS style execution (beheading of Norwegian tourist Hans Christian Ostro), rape of minority women (Sarla Bhatt, Girija Tickoo…I recall some were also kidnapped), targeting of minorities who were seen as close to India, and the list is endless.
If you thought liberals across the aisle, especially those from Kashmir would stand up for such revelation, then you really have no knowledge about the conflict there. Post 1990 Kashmir has produced some stellar bunch of human right activists, writers and journalists who have painstakingly chronicled the human impact of the conflict. However surprisingly any mention of their minorities, the impact of the conflict on them attracts some very strange reactions like ‘vendetta’, ‘right wingers’, ‘BJP sympathizers’, ‘sympathy gainers’, ‘victim of Jagmohan politics’ etc. I am now trying to research if such terms were also used for the Yazidis or the Palestinians or the Kurds or the Rohingyas by their majority communities who usurped their land and drove them from the place of their ancestors.
Yes, Kashmir is a conflict zone. Yes, India has not done everything right there. Yes, the Indian Army is guilty on many accounts in the Valley (I will put my hand and my neck out to fight for Konanposhpura). But my dear Kashmiri Muslims, is it your land only? Where are WE as you shout for azadi? Where is OUR right as you fight for the right of self-determination from India? Where is MY right to bequeath a piece of my ancestral land to my daughter? Its time you answered these questions before you bequeath grandiose ideas on Kashmir being a sovereign land to your children and honorable US Congress representatives.
#Kashmir #KPs #KashmiriPandits #Congressionalhearings